03Science & inquiry

The questions worth asking.

Published studies report real-robot gains from two wearable channels. The studies are small, and camera estimates of force also exist. Our job is to replicate them on a research task, print the held-out-user number, and publish it whichever way it falls.

Illustration of calibration geometry: fixation targets at known positions. Not data.

01Research notebook

Five questions the channels have to answer.

Reference work · no validated sensing yet
  1. 01

    Contact force

    What is the held-out-user error after a 15-minute calibration?

    Stand-in forearm sEMG/IMU bands, calibrated against fingertip force sensors, are to estimate per-finger force. Ember, the wrist band, is to replace them after its build gate. Cr4dle holds no force data that it recorded from a person. The project on the public Hyser corpus closed on its kill rule. On Hyser, the band emulation did not beat its zero-calibration pipeline or a constant predictor after calibration. On putEMG-Force, the 24-channel pipeline beat the constant predictor but not its zero-calibration pipeline. The number that counts is the cross-user (LOSO) error against a learned vision baseline, printed on the card: pooled 1.5 N or better at the 2026-10-05 gate, whose date passed with no result recorded in the registry, or the channel thesis is in question.

  2. 02

    Gaze target

    Does natural gaze earn its place in a policy?

    Published gaze-conditioned imitation results are replicated on a research task under a held-out-user split, and the number is published either way. A gaze target is where the wearer looked: a point on the scene camera, on the video clock; it is not a mental state.

  3. 03

    Sync error

    How far apart are the clocks, really?

    An LED flash the camera sees and the band logs gives each stream an offset; the residual is the sync error, floored at the detectors' resolution and re-derived from the raw area. It is measured on every recording, never copied from a spec sheet.

  4. 04

    Demonstrator state

    Does a physical state predict a discarded episode?

    Fatigue and safety-relevant physical states are a column on every episode. The open question, with a kill date, is whether that column predicts discards earlier than jerk and completion time. It never claims emotion, mood or stress.

  5. 05

    Social navigation

    Does the wearer's gaze add to head yaw in predicting the wearer's next path, in staged walks past another person?

    Lane two is a separate research lane: consented people are to walk among other consented people in staged sessions, recorded from the wearer's side. A frozen pre-registration checks the pipeline in a simulator first, with null, echo and planted controls, and that check never stops the lane by itself. It tests the pipeline, never gaze in people. A failed sensitivity part of that check makes a stop reading inconclusive, and a failed specificity part makes each recorded reading inconclusive. No lane-two encounter is recorded, so no result exists. Gaze is an input only, never a model target, and no model forecasts a bystander.

02From idea to evidence

Build. Measure.
Publish either way.

  1. Current work

    Make the kit inspectable.

    The recording path, the redaction stage, the exporter and the consent gate run end to end on synthetic data (`make demo`) and print the shape of every artefact, including a card whose unmeasured numbers say not run with their gate.

  2. Date passed · no result recorded

    Put the kit on a person.

    The date of the 2026-10-05 gate (sync error printed, at least ten hours from five participants with a card, and a cross-user force model against a vision baseline) passed with no result recorded in the registry. A new date is a founder decision. The next gate is the force ablation on by-hand episodes with at least 40 trials per arm. ADR-0136 suspends the paid gates of this phase. The research gates stay in force.

  3. Our standard

    Let the held-out number set the scope.

    A channel ships under a label-validity spec that names what grounds it, on whom it was validated and its evidence kind. A synthetic or simulated number is labelled as such and is never release-eligible.

03A clear boundary

A label is
not a story about you.

We do not claim to read thoughts, memories, dreams or emotions. Demonstrator state names fatigue and safety-relevant physical states under a label-validity spec, never a mental state; physiology such as EEG, EDA or heart rate is a recorded research column, never a product.

The EEG research tiers record research-only columns in bounded sessions on bought equipment, each question registered with a kill date before any session. Progress on one channel does not establish another; each earns its place with its own held-out-user number.